fr
es
de
× Fraud Alert COVID-19 FRAUD SCHEMES USING THE SHIELD Scientific BRANDS Read more..

UNDERSTANDING THE GLOVE VIRAL PENETRATION TEST (ISO 16604:2004 – Procedure B)

Technician gloved hand with picto stop virus written on

Many viruses, responsible for human diseases, circulate continuously throughout the world (Common cold, flu, Covid-19, Ebola, …). Viruses are part of the microbiological risks (such as bacteria or fungi) requiring the wearing of appropriate protection by professionals exposed to them, whether in the field of healthcare or research. Thus, disposable gloves designed for protection against viruses should display the word “VIRUS” under the pictogram denoting biological risk, thereby demonstrating that they have passed the ISO 16604:2004 viral penetration test (Procedure B).

 

REGULATORY CONTEXT FOR BIOLOGICAL PROTECTIVE GLOVES

 

There are 2 categories of gloves:

  • PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) protective gloves that are registered according to Regulation (EU) 2016/425.
  • MD (Medical Device) gloves that are registered according to Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

Some single-use gloves are dual registered as PPE and MD. Regardless of the regulations, disposable gloves are tested against various standards to ensure compliance with these European regulations.

 

Regarding protection against microbiological risks:

  • Medical Device gloves: EN 455-1:2020 relates to testing for freedom from holes and is part of the process for demonstrating conformance to Regulation (EU) 2017/745. It requires testing for water tightness, with each batch being sampled statistically based on an Acceptable Quality Level (AQL). An examination-type glove must achieve an AQL of 1.5 and a surgical glove an AQL of 0.65. Viruses are not covered by this medical standard. Indeed, the standard does not include a viral penetration test to claim protection against viruses.

 

  • Personal Protective Equipment gloves: ISO 374-5:2016 defines the performance requirements for risks against micro-organisms. ISO 374-2:2019 evaluates the barrier resistance of a glove against bacteria and fungi through a water or air penetration test. Performance is expressed as an Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (AQL<4 or Level 1 up to AQL<0.65 or Level 3 which is the highest performance level). Information on the performance level that has been achieved can be found in the user instructions. A pictogram indicating that the gloves provide protection against bacteria and fungi is required.

 

For gloves protecting against viruses, it is mandatory that the word “VIRUS” is displayed under the pictogram identifying protection against microorganisms.

Technician gloved hand with picto stop virus written on

If the gloves are marked “VIRUS”, users can be assured that the gloves have passed the viral penetration test using a Phi-X 174 bacteriophage and performed in accordance with ISO 16604:2004 Procedure B.

 

WHAT IS THE GLOVE VIRAL PENETRATION TEST?

 

The size of the viruses (typically from 0.01 to 0.4 μm) may enable them to penetrate through microporous holes in standard single-use gloves. It may therefore be desirable for professionals wearing disposable protective gloves against microbiological risks to ensure that their gloves have passed the viral penetration test.

This test consists of exposing a glove sample to a liquid suspension containing the bacteriophage Phi-X 174 during a sequence of successive durations and pressures. To be considered successful, no passage of viruses must be detected.

IMPORTANT TO NOTE:

  • The viral penetration test is mandatory for all gloves that claim protection against viruses.
  • If the test is passed, the words “VIRUS” is added under the pictogram identifying protective gloves against microorganisms.
  • This test applies to all gloves made of natural or synthetic polymer.
  • The glove performance must be included in the user instructions.

The viral penetration test is not a mandatory test but if it is not carried out, the manufacturer must display on the packaging “not tested against viruses”.

 

WHAT ARE THE KEY STEPS OF THE VIRAL PENETRATION TEST?

 

SHIELD Scientific single-use glove sampling with dispenserSTEP 1- SAMPLING PHASE

Three test specimens are selected and cut into squares with a minimum dimension of 70 mm. Each specimen has to be conditioned for a minimum of 24 h by exposure to a temperature of 21°C (+/- 5°C) and a relative humidity of 60% (+/- 10%). Other preconditioning options such as sterilization can be used.

 

Sample of disposable glove placed in a viral penetration test cellSTEP 2 – TEST PHASE

The penetration cell is placed horizontally on the lab bench. The sterile specimen is aseptically inserted in the penetration cell with the normal outside surface facing the cell reservoir. Sterile components of the cell are assembled.

Penetration cell is closed and mounted in a vertical position in test apparatus.Specimen is exposed to the bacteriophage challenge suspension using a specific pressure and time sequence related to Procedure B. The latter is specifically designed for testing materials of an elastomeric nature such as gloves. Testing is as follows:

  • 0kPa for 5 min,
  • Followed by 14 kPa for 1 min,
  • Followed by 0 kPa for 4 min.

 

Agar plate showing an assay to detect virusSTEP 3 – RESULTS PHASE

Visual detection of penetration is supplemented with an assay procedure that will detect viable viruses which penetrate the material even when liquid penetration is not visible. Any evidence of viral penetration for a test specimen constitutes a failure.

 

WHAT ARE THE LIMITATIONS OF THE GLOVE VIRAL PENETRATION TEST?

 

It should be noted that the gloves undergo no physical stress when subjected to this test. Therefore, it may be prudent to give yourself a safety margin in terms of deciding when to discard gloves and replace them with new ones! The information given is for guidance only and may not reflect the user’s application. A risk assessment should always be made by the user to assess the suitability of gloves for a specific application.

Note that the test method according to American ASTM F1671 is similar but is not specified in ISO 374-5:2016.

SHIELD Scientific offers a wide range of single-use nitrile and latex laboratory and cleanroom gloves that protect against biological hazards. All of SHIELD Scientific gloves have passed the viral penetration test. In addition, SHIELD Scientific offers gloves with an AQL of 0.25 or level 3 according to ISO 374-2:2019 to address the highest biological risks. This level of protection for standard laboratory gloves is exceptional and provides increased confidence in compliance with biosecurity procedures. For more data, please check our online glove selection guide on our www.shieldscientific.com website.

 

REQUEST INFORMATION AND SAMPLES NOW!

This post is also available in: French, German, Spanish

Categorised in: Glove education

Categories

Latest posts

WHY CONSIDER GLOVE TENSILE STRENGTH AND ELONGATION PROPERTIES?
Stretched glove during doning with text: gloves tearing? The better, the thicker!

The skin is an important route for penetration of chemicals or microbiological agents that are […]

UNDERSTANDING THE GLOVE VIRAL PENETRATION TEST (ISO 16604:2004 – Procedure B)
Technician gloved hand with picto stop virus written on

Many viruses, responsible for human diseases, circulate continuously throughout the world (Common cold, flu, Covid-19, […]

LAB INNOVATIONS 2022

  Meet SHIELD Scientific at Lab Innovations 2022. Stand L20, Hall 2 Wednesday, 02 November […]

UNDERSTANDING THE TEST METHOD FOR GLOVE DEGRADATION (ISO 374-4:2019)
Disposable-gloves-degradation-test-method-ISO-374-4-2019

The norm ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 374-1:2016+A1:2018 requires a degradation test for “… each […]

LEARNING ABOUT ESD DISPOSABLE GLOVES
Electrical arc between two hands

Everyone has experienced electric discharge by touching an object or something else. This is called […]